I am very astonished that the scientific picture of the real world around me is very deficient. It gives a lot of factual information, puts all our experience in a magnificently consistent order, but is ghastly silent about all that is really near to our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a word about red and blue, bitter and sweet, physical pain and physical delight; it knows nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, God and eternity. Science sometimes pretends to answer questions in these domains, but the answers are very often so silly that we are not inclined to take them seriously.
(Erwin Schrödinger, Nature and the Greeks and Science and Humanism, Cambridge University Press 2014, p. 95)
How true this is. We spend a lot of time studying science, logic, and nature, but we as a people truly know so very little!
Creation or Chaos: Modern Science and the Existence of God. In it, RC discusses the ideas of chance (and whether not that is a logical concept), the Law of Non-Contradiction, the Law of Causality, and whether it is logical or scientific to believe in the idea of chance at all. Does chance have being? Does it have creative force? Does time + space + chance = the universe as we know it?
I loved this series and its much deeper sister series, Defending Your Faith. If you have real questions about faith, God, creation, and whether or not faith is a scientific impossibility, I highly recommend you check these series out.
I will leave you with this thought that RC asks in his series:
If ever there was a time where there was absolutely NOTHING, then it is impossible for there to be ANYTHING.
A Self-Existent Being is required for there to be something or there would still be NOTHING.